Vol. 1 (2025)
Articles

Environmental Beliefs Override Knowledge: Psychological Mediation Mechanisms in Green Purchase Behavior

Arry Widodo
Master of Business Administration, Telkom University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Nurafni Rubiyanti
Master of Business Administration, Telkom University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia
Putu Nina Madiawati
Master of Business Administration, Telkom University, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia

Published 2025-11-10

Keywords

  • Environmental concern,
  • Green purchase intention,
  • Environmental belief,
  • Environmental knowledge,
  • Holistic wellbeing,
  • Sustainable consumption
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Environmental Beliefs Override Knowledge: Psychological Mediation Mechanisms in Green Purchase Behavior. (2025). Wellbeing Futures: Innovation, Policy and Research, 1, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.65638/2978-882X.2025.01.01

Abstract

Purpose: The study evaluates the intervening roles of environmental belief systems and environmental knowledge in the nexus between environmental concern and consumer intentions to purchase sustainable products among Indonesia's consumer population.

Design/methodology/approach: This study applied a quantitative research approach, employing structural equation modelling as the analytical method. The research sample consisted of 324 consumers sourced from five primary metropolitan regions in Indonesia.

Findings: The findings reveal that environmental concern exerts a positive influence on both environmental beliefs and environmental knowledge. Nevertheless, among these variables, only environmental beliefs demonstrate a statistically significant positive relationship with green purchase intention. The research establishes that environmental beliefs and knowledge serve as mediating mechanisms in the association between environmental concern and green purchase intention. Significantly, the study indicates that neither environmental concern nor environmental knowledge establishes a direct relationship with green purchase intention, suggesting complete mediation through belief systems.

Practical implications: The study results reveal that subjective consumer attitudes toward environmental challenges constitute stronger mediating variables compared to objective environmental understanding in the transformation of ecological awareness into buying intentions. This finding implies that practitioners in marketing and sustainability promotion should concentrate on developing positive environmental mindsets and fostering value alignment rather than exclusively pursuing knowledge expansion or educational outreach to effectively encourage environmentally responsible consumption patterns that enhance individual wellbeing and collective planetary health.

Originality/value: The present study enhances the body of sustainability research by providing empirical support for a holistic model that incorporates psychological drivers of eco-responsible purchasing behavior in emerging economic environments. By demonstrating that environmental beliefs serve as the primary psychological pathway to sustainable consumption, this research illuminates how aligning consumer behavior with deeply held values contributes to individual psychological wellbeing while simultaneously advancing societal and planetary health outcomes.

References

  1. Abrar, M., Sibtain, M. M., & Shabbir, R. (2021a). Understanding purchase intention towards eco-friendly clothing for generation Y & Z. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1997247. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1997247
  2. Abrar, M., Sibtain, M. M., & Shabbir, R. (2021b). Understanding purchase intention towards eco-friendly clothing for generation Y & Z. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1997247. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1997247
  3. Ahmad, W., & Zhang, Q. (2020). Green purchase intention: Effects of electronic service quality and customer green psychology. Journal of Cleaner Production, 267, 122053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122053
  4. Al Falah, K., Al Sughayir, A., & Albarq, A. N. (2024). The importance of environmental concern, trust and convenience in consumers’ purchase intentions of organic foods in a developing country. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2361319. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2361319
  5. Al Mamun, A., Naznen, F., Yang, Q., Ali, M. H., & Hashim, N. M. H. N. (2023). Modelling the significance of celebrity endorsement and consumer interest on attitude, purchase intention, and willingness to pay a premium price for green skincare products. Heliyon, 9(6), e16765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16765
  6. Al Mamun, A., Rahman, M. K., Masud, M. M., & Mohiuddin, M. (2023). Willingness to pay premium prices for green buildings: Evidence from an emerging economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(32), 78718-78734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27998-9
  7. Alam, M. Z., Ahmad, T., & Abunar, S. (2024). Investigating towards the sustainable green marketing environment of readymade apparel industries: A structural equation modelling approach. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 513-520. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2023.9.001
  8. Amin, S., & Tarun, M. T. (2021). Effect of consumption values on customers’ green purchase intention: A mediating role of green trust. Social Responsibility Journal, 17(8), 1320-1336. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2020-0191
  9. Ansari, S., & Gupta, S. (2021). Customer perception of the deceptiveness of online product reviews: A speech act theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102286
  10. Ashrafi, D. M., Islam, K. F., Shahid, T. S., & Sarker, Md. A. R. (2025). Going green or staying grey: Modelling the factors of green tech product purchase behaviour through interpretive structural modelling and MICMAC approach. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2024-0292
  11. Asif, M. H., Zhongfu, T., Irfan, M., Ahmad, B., & Ali, M. (2023). Assessing eco-label knowledge and sustainable consumption behavior in energy sector of Pakistan: An environmental sustainability paradigm. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(14), 41319-41332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25262-8
  12. Asif, M. H., Zhongfu, T., Irfan, M., & Işık, C. (2022). Do environmental knowledge and green trust matter for purchase intention of eco-friendly home appliances? An application of extended theory of planned behavior. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 37762-37774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24899-1
  13. Bagheri, A., Emami, N., & Damalas, C. A. (2023). Monitoring point source pollution by pesticide use: An analysis of farmers’ environmental behavior in waste disposal. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(7), 6711-6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02326-2
  14. Barrera-Verdugo, G. (2023). The link between social media exposure and students’ moral reasoning and environmental concern: A generational analysis in Chile. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), 2167570.
  15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2167570
  16. Bhardwaj, S., Sreen, N., Das, M., Chitnis, A., & Kumar, S. (2023). Product specific values and personal values together better explains green purchase. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 74, 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103434
  17. Bian, X., & Moutinho, L. (2011). The role of brand image, product involvement, and knowledge in explaining consumer purchase behaviour of counterfeits: Direct and indirect effects. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 191-216. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111095658
  18. Borusiak, B., Szymkowiak, A., Pierański, B., & Szalonka, K. (2021). The Impact of Environmental Concern on Intention to Reduce Consumption of Single-Use Bottled Water. Energies, 14(7), 1985. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071985
  19. Braga Junior, S., Martínez, M. P., Correa, C. M., Moura-Leite, R. C., & Da Silva, D. (2019). Greenwashing effect, attitudes, and beliefs in green consumption. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(2), 226-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-08-2018-0070
  20. Bulut, C., Nazli, M., Aydin, E., & Haque, A. U. (2021). The effect of environmental concern on conscious green consumption of post-millennials: The moderating role of greenwashing perceptions. Young Consumers, 22(2), 306-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-10-2020-1241
  21. Chan, A., & Sekarsari, A. (n.d.). Green Marketing: A Study of Consumers’ Buying Behavior in Relation to Green Products in Indonesia. 8(3).
  22. Chauhan, H., Pandey, A., Mishra, S., & Rai, S. K. (2021). Modeling the predictors of consumers’ online purchase intention of green products: The role of personal innovativeness and environmental drive. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16769-16785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01337-9
  23. Chen, C.-C., Chen, C.-W., & Tung, Y.-C. (2018). Exploring the Consumer Behavior of Intention to Purchase Green Products in Belt and Road Countries: An Empirical Analysis. Sustainability, 10(3), 854. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030854
  24. Chen, Y.-S., Chang, T.-W., Li, H.-X., & Chen, Y.-R. (2020). The Influence of Green Brand Affect on Green Purchase Intentions: The Mediation Effects of Green Brand Associations and Green Brand Attitude. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 4089. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114089
  25. Choi, D., & Johnson, K. K. P. (2019). Influences of environmental and hedonic motivations on intention to purchase green products: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.02.001
  26. De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2007). Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries: Validity of an Instrument to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic and Biospheric Value Orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107300278
  27. De Silva, M., Wang, P., & Kuah, A. T. H. (2021). Why wouldn’t green appeal drive purchase intention? Moderation effects of consumption values in the UK and China. Journal of Business Research, 122, 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.016
  28. Donnan, J. R., Johnston, K., Coombs, M., Najafizada, M., & Bishop, L. D. (2023a). Exploring Consumer Preferences for Cannabis Vaping Products to Support Public Health Policy: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 21(4), 651-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-023-00804-w
  29. Donnan, J. R., Johnston, K., Coombs, M., Najafizada, M., & Bishop, L. D. (2023b). Exploring Consumer Preferences for Cannabis Vaping Products to Support Public Health Policy: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 21(4), 651-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-023-00804-w
  30. Drechsel, P., Kracklauer, A. H., Menrad, K., & Decker, T. (2025). Packaging for a greener tomorrow: A structural equation model of consumer intentions to purchase environmentally friendly packaged foods in Germany. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 100275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2025.100275
  31. Duan, Y., Wu, R., Ji, H., Chen, X., Xu, J., Chen, Y., Sun, M., Pan, Y., & Zhou, L. (2022). Drinking water behavior and willingness to use filters by middle-aged and elderly residents in rural areas: A cross-sectional study in Tengchong, China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 961870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.961870
  32. Faisal, Y. A., Gunawan, I., Cupian, Hayati, A., Apriliadi, A., & Fajri, M. (2023a). Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk. Sustainability, 15(9), 7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430
  33. Faisal, Y. A., Gunawan, I., Cupian, Hayati, A., Apriliadi, A., & Fajri, M. (2023b). Examining the Purchase Intentions of Indonesian Investors for Green Sukuk. Sustainability, 15(9), 7430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097430
  34. Fawehinmi, O., Yusliza, M. Y., Mohamad, Z., Noor Faezah, J., & Muhammad, Z. (2020). Assessing the green behaviour of academics: The role of green human resource management and environmental knowledge. International Journal of Manpower, 41(7), 879-900. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2019-0347
  35. Fekete-Farkas, M. (2020). Why Not Green Marketing? Determinates of Consumers’ Intention to Green Purchase Decision in a New Developing Nation.
  36. Fernando, A. G., & Aw, E. C.-X. (2023a). What do consumers want? A methodological framework to identify determinant product attributes from consumers’ online questions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103335
  37. Fernando, A. G., & Aw, E. C. X. (2023b). What do consumers want? A methodological framework to identify determinant product attributes from consumers’ online questions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103335
  38. Fu, L., Sun, Z., Zha, L., Liu, F., He, L., Sun, X., & Jing, X. (2020). Environmental awareness and pro-environmental behavior within China’s road freight transportation industry: Moderating role of perceived policy effectiveness. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119796
  39. Ghouse, S. M., Shekhar, R., Ali Sulaiman, M. A. B., & Azam, A. (2024). Green purchase behaviour of Arab millennials towards eco-friendly products: The moderating role of eco-labelling. The Bottom Line. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-08-2023-0246
  40. Gu, W., Chan, K. W., Kwon, J., Dhaoui, C., & Septianto, F. (2023). Informational vs. emotional B2B firm-generated-content on social media engagement: Computerized visual and textual content analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 112, 98-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.04.012
  41. Hamzah, M. I., & Tanwir, N. S. (2021). Do pro-environmental factors lead to purchase intention of hybrid vehicles? The moderating effects of environmental knowledge. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123643
  42. Han, H. (2015). Travelers’ pro-environmental behavior in a green lodging context: Converging value-belief-norm theory and the theory of planned behavior. Tourism Management, 47, 164-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.09.014
  43. Huang, Y.-C. (2023). Integrated concepts of the UTAUT and TPB in virtual reality behavioral intention. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70, 103127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103127
  44. Jennings, G. R. (2005). Business, Social Science Methods Used in. In Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (pp. 219-230). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00270-X
  45. Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M., & Cordell, H. K. (2004). Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior: An Examination of the New Ecological Paradigm in a Social Psychological Context. Environment and Behavior, 36(2), 157-186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503251478
  46. Joo, K., & Hwang, J. (2023). Do Consumers Intend to Use Indoor Smart Farm Restaurants for a Sustainable Future? The Influence of Cognitive Drivers on Behavioral Intentions. Sustainability, 15(8), 6666. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086666
  47. Kamboj, S., Matharu, M., & Gupta, M. (2023). Examining consumer purchase intention towards organic food: An empirical study. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 9, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100121
  48. Kautish, P., & Sharma, R. (2019). Value orientation, green attitude and green behavioral intentions: An empirical investigation among young consumers. Young Consumers, 20(4), 338-358. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-11-2018-0881
  49. Kumar, R., Kumar, K., Singh, R., Sá, J. C., Carvalho, S., & Santos, G. (2023). Modeling Environmentally Conscious Purchase Behavior: Examining the Role of Ethical Obligation and Green Self-Identity. Sustainability, 15(8), 6426. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086426
  50. Li, C. (Cherise), Agyeiwaah, E., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Understanding tourists’ eco-paralysis, environmental concern, and pro-environmental behavior: An explanatory sequential mixed methods study. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(10), 2060-2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2266778
  51. Li, X., Dai, J., Zhu, X., Li, J., He, J., Huang, Y., Liu, X., & Shen, Q. (2023). Mechanism of attitude, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control influence the green development behavior of construction enterprises. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 266. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01724-9
  52. Liguo, X., Ahmad, M., Khan, S., Haq, Z. U., & Khattak, S. I. (2023). Evaluating the role of innovation in hybrid electric vehicle-related technologies to promote environmental sustainability in knowledge-based economies. Technology in Society, 74, 102283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102283
  53. Machaka-Mare, Z. M., Mpinganjira, M., & Maduku, D. K. (2023a). Understanding Binge Drinking Quitting Intention and Behaviour Using an Extended TPB. Social Marketing Quarterly, 29(2), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004231171888
  54. Machaka-Mare, Z. M., Mpinganjira, M., & Maduku, D. K. (2023b). Understanding Binge Drinking Quitting Intention and Behaviour Using an Extended TPB. Social Marketing Quarterly, 29(2), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004231171888
  55. Mahmud, A. (2024). How and when consumer corporate social responsibility knowledge influences green purchase behavior: A moderated-mediated model. Heliyon, 10(3), e24680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24680
  56. Majeed, S., Kim, W. G., & Kim, T. (2023a). Perceived green psychological benefits and customer pro-environment behavior in the value-belief-norm theory: The moderating role of perceived green CSR. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 113, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103502
  57. Majeed, S., Kim, W. G., & Kim, T. (2023b). Perceived green psychological benefits and customer pro-environment behavior in the value-belief-norm theory: The moderating role of perceived green CSR. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 113, 103502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2023.103502
  58. Munerah, S., Koay, K. Y., & Thambiah, S. (2021). Factors influencing non-green consumers’ purchase intention: A partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124192
  59. Ng, K. Y. N. (2023). Effects of organizational culture, affective commitment and trust on knowledge-sharing tendency. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 1140-1164. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0191
  60. Nkoulou Mvondo, G. F., Jing, F., Hussain, K., Jin, S., & Raza, M. A. (2022). Impact of International Tourists’ Co-creation Experience on Brand Trust, Brand Passion, and Brand Evangelism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 866362. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.866362
  61. Osorio, M. L., Centeno, E., & Cambra-Fierro, J. (2023). An empirical examination of human brand authenticity as a driver of brand love. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114059
  62. Papadas, K.-K., Avlonitis, G. J., & Carrigan, M. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 80, 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.024
  63. Park, J., Ryu, Y., & Kim, Y. (2024). Factors influencing air passengers’ intention to purchase voluntary carbon offsetting programs: The moderating role of environmental knowledge. Journal of Air Transport Management, 118, 102619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102619
  64. Qin, B., & Song, G. (2022). Internal Motivations, External Contexts, and Sustainable Consumption Behavior in China—Based on the TPB-ABC Integration Model. Sustainability, 14(13), 7677. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137677
  65. Ricci, E. C., Banterle, A., & Stranieri, S. (2018). Trust to Go Green: An Exploration of Consumer Intentions for Eco-friendly Convenience Food. Ecological Economics, 148, 54-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.02.010
  66. Rizqiyana, I., & Wahyono, W. (2020a). The Influence of Eco-Brand, Eco-Labelling and Environmental Advertisement on Consumer Purchasing Behavior through Brand Image. Management Analysis Journal, 9(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v9i2.28510
  67. Rizqiyana, I., & Wahyono, W. (2020b). The Influence of Eco-Brand, Eco-Labelling and Environmental Advertisement on Consumer Purchasing Behavior through Brand Image. Management Analysis Journal, 9(2), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v9i2.28510
  68. Roci, M., & Rashid, A. (2023). Economic and environmental impact of circular business models: A case study of White Goods-as-a-Service using multi-method simulation modelling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 407, 137147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137147
  69. Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008a). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices - Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00710.x
  70. Rokka, J., & Uusitalo, L. (2008b). Preference for green packaging in consumer product choices—Do consumers care? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 516-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00710.x
  71. Rukhsar, Yameen, M., & Khanam, Z. (2025). Understanding the consumer purchase behaviour towards green electronic products: Using insight from the theory of planned behaviour. IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies, 4(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1108/IRJMS-01-2024-0002
  72. S., V., Srivastava, N., & Mittal, A. (2024). How does green trust mediate the relationship between environmental concern and green brand knowledge during green purchases? Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-04-2024-0229
  73. Santirocchi, A., Spataro, P., Alessi, F., Rossi-Arnaud, C., & Cestari, V. (2023). Trust in science and belief in misinformation mediate the effects of political orientation on vaccine hesitancy and intention to be vaccinated. Acta Psychologica, 237, 103945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103945
  74. Saputra, A. D., Pranoto, W., & Yuniarty. (2021). The Factors of Environmental and Social Awareness, Altruism as Determinants of Purchase Intention, Green Brand Loyalty and Green Brand Evangelism. 2021 Innovations in Energy Management and Renewable Resources(52042), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMRE52042.2021.9386784
  75. Saputro, E. P., Setyaningrum, D. P., & Febriyanto, A. (2025). Understanding Generation Z Muslims in Indonesia to switching intention to buy green products: A stimulus-organism-response approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2024-0083
  76. Sewwandi, J. P. N., & Dinesha, P. K. C. (2022). The impact of green marketing tools on green product purchase behavior: The moderation effect of consumer demographics. Asian Journal of Marketing Management, 1(01). https://doi.org/10.31357/ajmm.v1i01.5469
  77. Sharma, N., Paço, A., & Kautish, P. (2022). The impact of eco-innovation on green buying behaviour: The moderating effect of emotional loyalty and generation. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(4), 1026-1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-11-2021-0267
  78. Simanjuntak, M., Nafila, N. L., Yuliati, L. N., Johan, I. R., Najib, M., & Sabri, M. F. (2023). Environmental Care Attitudes and Intention to Purchase Green Products: Impact of Environmental Knowledge, Word of Mouth, and Green Marketing. Sustainability, 15(6), 5445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065445
  79. Sinha, R., & Annamdevula, S. (2025). Unveiling the consequences of perceived greenwash among youth: A focus on the moderating role of environmental knowledge. Society and Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-02-2024-0059
  80. Susminingsih, S., Mujib, A., Wahdati, A., Baharuddin, M. A., & Maylawati, D. S. (2024). Religiosity as an intervening variable in consumers’ increased green purchase intention (GPI) toward natural dye batik in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 15(12), 3357-3381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-06-2023-0184
  81. Tavitiyaman, P., Zhang, X., & Chan, H. M. (2024). Impact of environmental awareness and knowledge on purchase intention of an eco-friendly hotel: Mediating role of habits and attitudes. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, 7(5), 3148-3166. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-08-2023-0580
  82. Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Nikbin, D., Seong Zhen, K., & Hanifah, H. (2025). Exploring the determinants of green electronics purchase intention through the stimulus-organism-response model. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(3), 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-02-2024-0109
  83. Vilkaite-Vaitone, N., Skackauskiene, I., & Díaz-Meneses, G. (2022). Measuring Green Marketing: Scale Development and Validation. Energies, 15(3), 718. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030718
  84. Watson, J. E. M., Evans, T., Venter, O., Williams, B., Tulloch, A., Stewart, C., Thompson, I., Ray, J. C., Murray, K., Salazar, A., McAlpine, C., Potapov, P., Walston, J., Robinson, J. G., Painter, M., Wilkie, D., Filardi, C., Laurance, W. F., Houghton, R. A., Lindenmayer, D. (2018). The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(4), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x
  85. Witek, L., & Kuźniar, W. (2020). Green Purchase Behavior: The Effectiveness of Sociodemographic Variables for Explaining Green Purchases in Emerging Market. Sustainability, 13(1), 209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010209
  86. Yang, J., Al Mamun, A., Reza, M. N. H., Yang, M., & Aziz, N. A. (2024). Predicting the significance of consumer environmental values, beliefs, and norms for sustainable fashion behaviors: The case of second-hand clothing. Asia Pacific Management Review, 29(2), 179-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.01.001
  87. Yue, B., Sheng, G., She, S., & Xu, J. (2020). Impact of Consumer Environmental Responsibility on Green Consumption Behavior in China: The Role of Environmental Concern and Price Sensitivity. Sustainability, 12(5), 2074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052074
  88. Yusiana, R., Widodo, A., & Hidayat, A. M. (2021). Green Purchase Intention: An Investigation Green Brand Knowledge and Green Perceived Value of Bioplastic Products in Bandung - Indonesia. Inclusive Society and Sustainability Studies, 1(2), 24-32. https://doi.org/10.31098/issues.v1i2.709
  89. Zhang, L., Fan, Y., Zhang, W., & Zhang, S. (2019). Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain the Effects of Cognitive Factors across Different Kinds of Green Products. Sustainability, 11(15), 4222. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154222